MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Onde estão os contratos? Análise da relação entre os prestadores privados de serviços de saúde e o SUS

2003· article· pt· W2043207268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCiência & Saúde Coletiva · 2003
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health in Brazil
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo trata da situação contratual da rede assistencial privada vinculada ao Sistema Único de Saúde. Descreve essa rede e mostra o aumento do número de hospitais públicos municipais, a forte participação dos hospitais universitários. Evidencia que a rede ambulatorial é predominantemente pública. Analisa a situação contratual, com base nos dados do Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde, banco de dados recentemente implantado pelo Ministério da Saúde, visando agregar num único sistema todas as informações disponíveis sobre prestadores de serviços públicos e privados vinculados ao SUS. Aponta os problemas e indefinições no processo de contratação de prestadores privados de serviço de saúde. Conclui que os contratos podem representar uma maior responsabilização dos gestores e prestadores, além de possibilitar maior garantia dos direitos dos usuários e induzir à melhoria da qualidade dos serviços.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it