Onde estão os contratos? Análise da relação entre os prestadores privados de serviços de saúde e o SUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo trata da situação contratual da rede assistencial privada vinculada ao Sistema Único de Saúde. Descreve essa rede e mostra o aumento do número de hospitais públicos municipais, a forte participação dos hospitais universitários. Evidencia que a rede ambulatorial é predominantemente pública. Analisa a situação contratual, com base nos dados do Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde, banco de dados recentemente implantado pelo Ministério da Saúde, visando agregar num único sistema todas as informações disponíveis sobre prestadores de serviços públicos e privados vinculados ao SUS. Aponta os problemas e indefinições no processo de contratação de prestadores privados de serviço de saúde. Conclui que os contratos podem representar uma maior responsabilização dos gestores e prestadores, além de possibilitar maior garantia dos direitos dos usuários e induzir à melhoria da qualidade dos serviços.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".