MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043219011 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001174

The Evolving Landscape of the Economics of HIV Treatment and Prevention

2012· article· en· W2043219011 on OpenAlexafffund
Bohdan Nosyk, Joan Montaner

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health CareSt. Paul's Hospital
FundersCHIST-ERACanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPublic Health AgencyNational Institutes of HealthInternational AIDS SocietyPublic Health Agency of CanadaMichael Smith Health Research BCBill and Melinda Gates FoundationViiV HealthcareWorld Health OrganizationNational Institute on Drug AbuseBristol-Myers SquibbGilead Sciences
KeywordsPublic healthMedicineAgency (philosophy)Health careFamily medicinePolitical scienceLibrary scienceNursingLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: Treatment as Prevention of HIV/AIDSThe Essay section contains opinion pieces on topics of broad interest to a general medical audience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.015
Scholarly communication0.0130.020
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0100.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207