MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043230349 · doi:10.1039/b303425a

Photoaffinity labeling on magnetic microspheres (PALMm) methodology for topographic mapping: preparation of PALMm reagents and demonstration of biochemical relevance

2003· article· en· W2043230349 on OpenAlexaff
Efrat Halbfinger, Karine Gorochesky, Sébastien A. Lévesque, Adrien R. Beaudoin, Larisa Sheihet, Shlomo Margel, Bilha Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryApyraseReagentContext (archaeology)HexokinasePhotoaffinity labelingLigand (biochemistry)Combinatorial chemistryMicrosphereRelevance (law)BiochemistryEnzymeComputational biologyChromatographyBinding siteReceptorOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoaffinity labeling (PAL) is a technique widely used for identifying the binding-site within proteins. Although the classic method is both versatile and powerful, it suffers significant disadvantages, such as the need to radiolabel the PAL ligand, and the need to conduct highly complicated separations of both the labeled protein and the labeled peptides derived from it. Here, we propose a novel and universal methodology--Photo-Affinity Labeling on Magnetic microspheres (PALMm) designed to simplify and shorten the PAL protocol. In this context, we describe the preparation of PALMm reagents and the evaluation of their biochemical relevance regarding two ATP-binding enzymes: hexokinase and apyrase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic & Biomolecular ChemistrySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207