Production of the Type IV Secretion System Differs among <i>Brucella</i> Species as Revealed with VirB5- and VirB8-Specific Antisera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expression of the virB operon, encoding the type IV secretion system required for Brucella suis virulence, occurred in the acidic phagocytic vacuoles of macrophages and could be induced in minimal medium at acidic pH values. To analyze the production of VirB proteins, polyclonal antisera against B. suis VirB5 and VirB8 were generated. Western blot analysis revealed that VirB5 and VirB8 were detected after 3 h in acidic minimal medium and that the amounts increased after prolonged incubation. Unlike what occurs in the related organism Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the periplasmic sugar binding protein ChvE did not contribute to VirB protein production, and B. suis from which chvE was deleted was fully virulent in a mouse model. Comparative analyses of various Brucella species revealed that in all of them VirB protein production increased under acidic conditions. However, in rich medium at neutral pH, Brucella canis and B. suis, as well as the Brucella abortus- and Brucella melitensis-derived vaccine strains S19, RB51, and Rev.1, produced no VirB proteins or only small amounts of VirB proteins, whereas the parental B. abortus and B. melitensis strains constitutively produced VirB5 and VirB8. Thus, the vaccine strains were still able to induce virB expression under acidic conditions, but the VirB protein production was markedly different from that in the wild-type strains at pH 7. Taken together, the data indicate that VirB protein production and probably expression of the virB operon are not uniformly regulated in different Brucella species. Since VirB proteins were shown to modulate Brucella phagocytosis and intracellular trafficking, the differential regulation of the production of these proteins reported here may provide a clue to explain their role(s) during the infection process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".