Spermatozoa modulate epididymal cell proliferation and protein secretion in vitro
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Normal epididymal function, such as protein expression and secretion, is primarily regulated by testicular androgens and temperature. However, the role of spermatozoa in this critical process has never been studied. In order to determine whether sperm itself could regulate epididymal function, we have developed a cell culture system of bovine epididymal cells to study the interactions between spermatozoa and the epididymal epithelium. Primary cells from caput, corpus, and cauda epididymal tissues were cultured in the presence of androgens at 32 degrees C (scrotal) and 37 degrees C (abdominal). Newly synthesized proteins were metabolically labeled with (35)S-methionine after sperm co-incubation and the pattern of secreted proteins was analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proliferation rate, protein secretion rate and electrophoretic patterns of secreted proteins were evaluated 48 hr post-co-incubation. Incubation at 32 degrees C indicated that spermatozoa stimulation increases the level of protein secretion of cultured cells from all epididymal sections while it slightly decreases proliferation of corpus cells. At 37 degrees C, spermatozoa co-incubation significantly decreases the protein secretion rate of cultured cells from all epididymal sections. Independently of cell incubation temperature, spermatozoa stimulation induces both an increase in the intensity of radiolabeled proteins and the appearance of new secreted proteins of caput cells without affecting the protein pattern of corpus or cauda cells. Incubation at 37 degrees C, however, greatly modifies the pattern of proteins expressed at 32 degrees C by cauda cells. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that spermatozoa themselves affect epididymal cell function, most importantly for caput epididymides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it