CTG Expansion & Haplotype Analysis in DM1 Gene in Healthy Iranian Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is due to an unstable expansion of CTG repeat in the DMPK gene (19q13.3). The CTG repeat is highly polymorphic (5 to 37) in healthy individuals. According to the hypothesis that expanded (CTG)n alleles originated from larger normal alleles, there may exist a correlation between the prevalence of DM1 and the frequency of large size normal alleles. Strong linkage disequilibrium between different length alleles and the three biallelic markers, Alu, Hinf1 and Taq1, has been reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of normal alleles, the frequency of larger normal alleles and analysis of the three biallelic markers, in healthy Iranian controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted on two hundred unrelated healthy individuals from different ethnic groups living in Iran to determine the size of the alleles. Markers were analyzed by PCR/RFLP on 174 chromosomes from other control healthy individuals. RESULTS: Our data reveals that 23.7% of alleles had 5 CTG repeats and 7.2% of alleles had > 18 CTG repeats. The analysis of haplotypes revealed that 75% of CTG5 and 80% of CTG > 18 had the (+++) haplotype. CONCLUSION: The frequency of alleles with CTG > 18 in Iran is similar to that of Western Europe and Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".