MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surveying emotional prosody in the brain

2002· article· en· W204330097 on OpenAlexaff
Marc D. Pell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmotional prosodyProsodyEmotivePsychologyCognitive psychologyComprehensionPerceptionNeuroscienceLinguisticsComputer scienceSpeech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Re#e#qkq has long supporte# a pivotal righthe#tk()1I0 contribution tothe de##OqW( ofe#kO2qO5k prosody, although a broade# ne#ade# of cortical and subcorticalstructure# is now thought to support diffe#tkO compone#(I of this functional syste# during inputproce#)Iq5k This pape# highlights important work implicatingthe basal ganglia ine#k(W)O)k prosody de#sodykI e#odykI521 inre#I((qk4WI ke# affe#((qk stimulus prope#skI2 ne#pe#skI forhighe#2)k4W2 inte##2)k4W201 proce##2)k The role ofthe righthe#tkOIOI5 ine#()I0qk4W5 e#Ike#0qk4W5I0Ike# stimuli isthe# conside#4W inre#()522k to pre#(IWq `functional' and `auditory-pe#)Wke#4WW capacitie# of constitue#W re#stitu Abroade# de#de#k4W)I ofthe right he#htk(IWq)k jurisdiction in social-e#W(22q be#cial-e is advocate# toadvance future work in this are#k and ane#paradigmtotapon-line compre#0k4Wq2 ofe#k(O(15k prosody in clinical populations is de#W)2Ok4) 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207