Évaluation de l'état du béton par la technique d'analyse spectrale des ondes de Rayleigh
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evaluation of concrete deteriorations is essential to optimize the costs and ensure that the required retrofits are durable. A study undertaken on many experimental concrete specimens has shown that an analysis of the dispersion of Rayleigh waves enables differentiation between concrete of different mechanical properties, description of the evolution of these properties with respect to depth, and detection of defaults in the concrete mass. The study of the different monitoring and processing parameters associated with this technique reveals that the choice of the type of emission source must be accomplished with respect to the thickness of the material under study, and that the distance between the emission source and the sensors as well as the distance between sensors do not have any effect on the Rayleigh wave speed profile. A new monitoring configuration is proposed to improve the experimental procedure.Key words: concrete, deterioration, nondestructive tests, spectral analysis of Rayleigh waves.[Journal translation]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it