MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043340403 · doi:10.1109/isda.2010.5687233

Rough, fuzzy, interval clustering for web usage mining

2010· article· en· W2043340403 on OpenAlexaff
Manish Joshi, Pawan Lingras, Yiyu Yao, C. Bhavsar Virendrakumar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickSaint Mary's UniversityUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceData miningFuzzy clusteringRough setFuzzy setSet (abstract data type)Cluster (spacecraft)Representation (politics)Web miningInterval (graph theory)Fuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsWeb pageCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuzzy C-means (FCM) and Rough K-means (RKM) algorithms are two popular soft clustering algorithms that allow for overlapping clusters. The overlapping clusters can be useful in applications where restrictions imposed by crisp clustering that force assignment of every object to a unique cluster may not be practical. Likewise RKM and FCM, interval set representation of clusters would also generate overlapping clusters. We present and discuss the interval set K-means algorithm (IKM). This paper applies RKM, FCM and IKM algorithms for clustering web visits to an educational site. The experimental comparison highlights various features of these three soft computing algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRough Sets and Fuzzy LogicFrench-language works237,207