MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of Borehole Thermal Resistance Values of Ground Heat Exchanger Obtained by Several Methods

2013· article· en· W2043352264 on OpenAlexaff
Han Byul Kang, Seok Yoon, Gyu Hyun Go, Seung Rae Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeHeat pumpHeat exchangerGeothermal gradientGeothermal energyGroutEnvironmental scienceThermal resistanceThermalHeat transferEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringNuclear engineeringMechanical engineeringMechanicsGeologyMeteorologyGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ground-Coupled or Source Heat Pump (GCHP/GSHP) system is increasingly being considered as an alternative to traditional cooling/heating system because it can reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. The GCHP/GSHP system uses sustainable ground temperature to emit heat during the summer and to extract heat during the winter. It is a ubiquitous system because it can be used at any time or place and semi-permanent energy. The geothermal system is composed of Ground Heat Exchanger (GHE), heat pump and load facilities. The GHE is embedded in a borehole, which is made up of GHE and grout. The borehole thermal resistance is the most important parameter in designing the geothermal system because it shows the quantity of heat transfer in the borehole. There are many methods to estimate the borehole thermal resistance. Thermal Performance Tests (TPTs) were conducted to directly measure the borehole thermal resistance of several kinds of GHEs. Then the experiment results and analytical results were compared in order to select the most accurate methods to evaluate the borehole thermal resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207