MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043391903 · doi:10.1097/ftd.0b013e3181b33da3

An Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Cetuximab

2009· article· en· W2043391903 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Cézé, David Ternant, Danielle Degenne, Nicolas Azzopardi, Étienne Dorval, Hervé Watier, Thierry Lecomte, Gilles Paintaud

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCetuximabPharmacokineticsColorectal cancerTherapeutic drug monitoringEpidermal growth factor receptorMedicinePharmacodynamicsPharmacologyPopulationInternal medicineOncologyReceptorCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cetuximab is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of colorectal and head and neck cancers. Part of the interindividual differences in response may be explained by interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. An assay measuring cetuximab serum concentrations is therefore needed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed using microtiter plates sensitized with a recombinant human epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain. Lower and upper limits of quantitation and limit of detection were determined. Eight standard calibrators (SCs) and 3 quality controls (QCs), that is, 0.75, 7.5, and 15 mg/L, were tested on 5 occasions on 1 day and on 5 occasions on different days. Trough and peak serum concentrations of cetuximab were measured in 15 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 patient with undetermined neoplasia undergoing cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Cetuximab concentrations were described using a 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. Imprecision and accuracy of SC and QC were < or = 20%, except for the 0 and 0.1 mg/L SC concentrations (< or = 20%). The limit of detection was 0.012 mg/L. Lower and upper limits of quantitation were 0.75 and 15 mg/L, respectively. A total number of 198 blood samples were available from the 16 patients. Median (range) trough and peak concentrations during the treatment were 49.6 (5.8-105.4) and 177.2 (97.5-235) mg/L, respectively. This method is rapid, accurate, and reproducible and may be useful for pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies, as well as in therapeutic drug monitoring of cetuximab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207