MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043392262 · doi:10.3917/cdge.031.0129

La « mise en science » de la ménopause

2001· article· fr· W2043392262 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers du Genre · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La construction sexuée du vieillissement situe la ménopause tant comme porte d’entrée que comme clôture sur une vieillesse déficitaire, sous l’emprise des modélisations biomédicales. Étudiées en Amérique du Nord et en Europe principalement, ces mises aux normes du corps des femmes — avant, pendant et après la ménopause — allient les pathologisations aux modes de prévention comme le démontrent les résultats de l’analyse des journaux scientifiques. Les publications des recherches féministes apportent la controverse à ces représentations et aux pratiques qui l’accompagnent, démontrant le traitement différentiel du vieillissement masculin et féminin et les rapports sociaux de sexe sous-jacents à ces formes de médicalisation. S’il en résulte une certaine déstigmatisation de la ménopause, de nouvelles injonctions semblent se renforcer, sollicitant simultanément l’autodiscipline des corps contre le poids économique des vieilles femmes potentiellement à charge et le maintien de leurs éternelles jeunesse et féminité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it