Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé La construction sexuée du vieillissement situe la ménopause tant comme porte d’entrée que comme clôture sur une vieillesse déficitaire, sous l’emprise des modélisations biomédicales. Étudiées en Amérique du Nord et en Europe principalement, ces mises aux normes du corps des femmes — avant, pendant et après la ménopause — allient les pathologisations aux modes de prévention comme le démontrent les résultats de l’analyse des journaux scientifiques. Les publications des recherches féministes apportent la controverse à ces représentations et aux pratiques qui l’accompagnent, démontrant le traitement différentiel du vieillissement masculin et féminin et les rapports sociaux de sexe sous-jacents à ces formes de médicalisation. S’il en résulte une certaine déstigmatisation de la ménopause, de nouvelles injonctions semblent se renforcer, sollicitant simultanément l’autodiscipline des corps contre le poids économique des vieilles femmes potentiellement à charge et le maintien de leurs éternelles jeunesse et féminité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".