MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043401877 · doi:10.4161/cc.5.2.2365

Protein Kinase A(PKA)-Restrictcive and PKA-Permissive Phases of Oocyte Maturation

2005· article· en· W2043401877 on OpenAlexafffund
Jing Wang, Winnie Li Cao, X. Johné Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOocyteProtein kinase ABiologyEndogenyMeiosisCell biologyKinaseProphaseMaturation promoting factorBiochemistryCyclin-dependent kinase 1EmbryoCell cycleCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substantial evidence has indicated that cAMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A or PKA) plays a critical role in maintaining meiotic prophase arrest in vertebrate oocytes. However, PKA activity dynamic and its physiological substrate profile during oocyte maturation remain poorly defined. We have recently developed a novel PKA substrate construct which we employ to monitor PKA activity in live oocytes. We demonstrated here that, during progesterone-induced oocyte maturation, PKA was inactivated within 30 min of the addition of progesterone and thereafter remained inactivated throughout the entire maturation process. However, artificial reactivation of endogenous PKA had differential consequences, depending on the timing of PKA reactivation. Reactivation of endogenous PKA at any time prior to germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) inhibited progesterone-induced GVBD. PKA reactivation at GVBD, or thereafter, did not interfere with meiosis I to meiosis II transition, nor did it interfere with metaphase II arrest. These results demonstrate for the first time a PKA-restrictive and a PKA-permissive phase in oocyte maturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207