Structural and sequence effects in the fragmentation of protonated tripeptides containing tyrosine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fragmentation reactions of a variety of protonated tripeptides containing tyrosine in the three possible positions have been studied by energy-resolved collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry. The primary fragmentation reactions involve cleavage of the N-terminal and (or) C-terminal amide bond with the relative importance of the two cleavages depending strongly on the identity and position of the amino acid residues in the tripeptide. The results are interpreted in terms of the a1y mechanism for cleavage of the N-terminal amide bond and the bxyz mechanism for cleavage of the C-terminal amide bond and, indeed, provide support for these mechanisms. However, it appears likely that, for protonated H-Val-Tyr-Pro-OH, the neutral accompanying formation of the y1 (protonated proline) ion is a cyclic dipeptide (cyclo-Val-Tyr) rather than the oxazolone predicted by the bxyz mechanism.Key words: tyrosine-containing peptides, fragmentation mechanisms, tandem mass spectrometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".