MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043449485 · doi:10.1517/14728222.2014.855199

Targeting the type III secretion system to treat bacterial infections

2013· review· en· W2043449485 on OpenAlexafffund
Natalie C. Marshall, B. Brett Finlay

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSecretionType three secretion systemVirulenceBiologyAntibioticsMode of actionComputational biologyMicrobiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Causative agents of pneumonia, gastroenteritis, typhoid fever, and plague all utilize a type III secretion system (T3SS) to directly inject proteins into human cells and cause disease. These bacterial pathogens are frequently resistant to antibiotics and novel treatment options are needed. The T3SS is essential for virulence and can be inhibited to prevent disease. AREAS COVERED: T3SS structure and assembly are introduced in this review, highlighting targets for T3SS-specific therapeutics. Promising inhibitors of type III secretion (T3S), their modes of action, and successful techniques for their identification are reviewed. T3S inhibitor research has focused on small molecules identified in high-throughput screens, although recently inhibitors have also been identified or engineered by rational design. Promising compounds have emerged that inhibit T3S and attenuate virulence in several pathogens, including an engineered antibody in clinical trials. T3S inhibitor research may yield effective treatments and prophylactics that are effective against a wide range of human pathogens. EXPERT OPINION: More techniques are needed to identify the mode of action for compounds identified in high-throughput screens, a long-standing challenge. Although only a few groups have attempted rational design of inhibitors, the approach has seen initial success and mechanistic follow-up studies are greatly simplified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic TargetsSame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207