MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D Nonlinear Viscoelastic-Viscoplastic Model for Ramming Paste Used in a Hall-Héroult Cell

2014· article· en· W2043457247 on OpenAlexafffund
Sakineh Orangi, Mario Fafard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlcoa
KeywordsViscoplasticityViscoelasticityCreepMaterials scienceConstitutive equationDissipative systemNonlinear systemComposite materialHydrostatic equilibriumThermodynamicsStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ramming paste is a carbonaceous porous material used in Hall-Héroult cells. It is baked in place under varying loads. To model the cell mechanical behavior during its lifespan, it was necessary to develop a constitutive law that included ramming paste creep behavior. A three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear viscoelastic-viscoplastic constitutive law was devised and developed to model the primary and secondary creep stages of baked paste. The model consisted of two parts (i.e., viscoelastic and viscoplastic). Each creep mechanism was based on the existence of a dissipative potential for the hydrostatic and deviatoric parts. Analytical solutions were presented for linear creep behavior. For the nonlinear case, the deviatoric part of the viscoelastic behavior could be obtained numerically, and all other parts analytically. Finally, model parameters were identified for paste baked and tested at different temperatures. A pattern search algorithm was used to optimize the model parameters. A comparison of the results gained from the model with experimental results showed that the devised model well represented the nonlinear viscoelastic-viscoplastic behavior of the paste baked at 250°C and tested at room temperature. In addition, the model was able to predict the qualitative creep behavior of the paste baked at 350, 560, and 1,000°C and tested at 300, 300, and 25°C, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering MechanicsSame topicInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207