Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article démontre que quatre dessins animés satiriques américains, The Simpsons, South Park, American Dad ! et Family Guy , sont plus que de simples objets de divertissement et contiennent des discours éminemment politiques sur l’immigration non documentée et la construction d’un mur à la frontière des États-Unis et du Mexique. Nous inspirant d’une catégorisation des courants de pensée sur les politiques d’immigration développée par Daniel Tichenor, nous procédons à l’analyse qualitative de contenu et de discours d’un corpus d’épisodes des dessins animés étudiés pour illustrer comment ils offrent un espace discursif aux principaux courants de pensée sur les enjeux susmentionnés. Nous démontrons aussi que The Simpsons , American Dad ! et Family Guy contiennent un discours satirique dirigé contre les positions conservatrices et qui valorise les positions progressistes sur ces mêmes enjeux, mais que South Park n’inclut pas un biais aussi évident pour l’un ou l’autre des courants de pensée sur l’immigration et la construction du mur américano-mexicain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".