A software framework for multi-agent control of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles for underwater mine counter-measures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a novel robot control framework is presented for multiple autonomous underwater vehicles. In this framework, we incorporate sonar sensor data and integrated navigation system position data in a simulation environment, called UNBeatable-Sim, where complex control behaviors can be executed and analyzed. UNBeatable-Sim is developed by the COllaboration Based Robotics and Automation (COBRA) research group at the University of New Brunswick, Canada. Range and pose sensor data are accumulated in an ocean environment constructed using seabed data collected at Bedford Basin, Nova Scotia, Canada by DRDC Atlantic. A seabed map is generated from the real-world data using UNBeatable-Sim. The underwater vehicle and the seabed are simulated and visualized using OpenGL. An external controller implemented using Matlab and Simulink is used to control the robot model. Simulations of multiple underwater vehicles to navigate in the ocean environment to sense and map the seabed are performed using UNBeatable-Sim to assess the system architecture and controller performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it