Responses of the mesospheric wind at high latitudes to the April 2002 space storm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An intense space storm occurred on 17–20 April, 2002. The effects of this storm on the mesospheric wind system were observed by two meteor wind radars at Andenes (69N, 16E) and Esrange (68N, 21E). At those locations, neutral winds showed a pattern similar to the ion convection pattern on 17 April for several hours at altitudes of 94–97 km. It is the first time that this kind of wind pattern is detected at such low altitudes. In contrast, winds by a medium frequency radar at Poker Flat (65N, 213E) showed no obvious storm effect, reflecting different responses of the dayside atmosphere and the nightside atmosphere. The ion convection wind pattern at Andenes and Esrange only appeared on the first day of the storm. We hypothesize that this behaviour may be related to a short‐lived but prominent electron density enhancement in the local thermosphere on the same day observed by an incoherent scatter radar at Svalbard (78N, 16E).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".