MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043513879 · doi:10.1177/14746514010010021201

Human islet transplantation: expectation versus reality

2001· article· en· W2043513879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K.A. Heald, T.R. Jay, Richard Downing

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Diabetes · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsletMedicineTransplantationDiabetes mellitusClinical trialIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although experimental islet isolation and transplantation has continued for over 25 years, the results of human islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes were disappointing until June 2000 when the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada reported 100% insulin independence in a cohort of seven patients. The study introduced several innovations now under evaluation worldwide. In the United Kingdom, an Islet Transplant Consortium has been established to co-ordinate clinical trials in several centres. The Canadian results have renewed hope of establishing islet transplantation as a treatment for diabetes while highlighting the need to identify plentiful sources of insulin secreting tissue and alternatives to current immunosuppressive therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe British Journal of DiabetesSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207