MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043517840 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638725

Multivariate Student's-t mixture model for bounded support data

2013· article· en· W2043517840 on OpenAlexaff
Thanh Minh Nguyen, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixture modelBounded functionStudent's t-distributionGaussianComputer scienceExtension (predicate logic)Multivariate normal distributionDistribution (mathematics)Gaussian processApplied mathematicsMathematicsMultivariate statisticsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningEconometricsMathematical analysisAutoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The finite mixture model based on the Student's-t distribution, which is heavily tailed and more robust than the Gaussian mixture model (GMM), is a flexible and powerful tool to address many pattern recognition problems. However, the Student's-t distribution is unbounded. In many applications, the observed data are digitalized and have bounded support. A new finite multivariate Student's-t mixture model for bounded support data, which includes the GMM and the Student's-t mixture model (SMM) as special cases, is presented in this paper. We propose an extension of the Student's-t distribution in this paper. This new distribution is sufficiently flexible to fit different shapes of observed data, such as non-Gaussian, non-symmetric, and bounded support data. Another advantage of the proposed model is that each of its components can model the observed data with different bounded support regions. In order to estimate the model parameters, previous models represent the Student's-t distributions as an infinite mixture of scaled Gaussians. We propose an alternate approach in order to minimize the higher bound on the data negative log-likelihood function, and directly deal with the Student's-t distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207