MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Field Estimates of Hydraulic Resistance of Ice-Covered Rivers

2011· article· en· W2043524822 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogarithmRange (aeronautics)GeologyComposite numberGeotechnical engineeringVolume (thermodynamics)Hydrology (agriculture)MathematicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysicsMathematical analysisComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large volume of velocity profiles measured from ice-covered rivers is used to estimate the composite Manning’s coefficient n o associated with the ice and riverbed. Estimates are obtained using four methods, based on (I) depth-averaged and maximum velocities, (II) logarithmic velocity distributions fitted to field data, (III) energy slope combined with the logarithmic velocity distributions, and (IV) the Manning’s equation. Estimates of the composite coefficient range from 0.012 to 0.040. The coefficient can increase up to seven-fold through the winter. Method (II) has shown advantages. The energy slope appears to be between 25% and 50% of the water slope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207