MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043567029 · doi:10.1071/ch09290

Adsorption and Dipole Surface Orientational Order at Liquid Surfaces*

2010· article· en· W2043567029 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce M. Law, Jae-Hie Cho, John H. Carpenter, Dan S. P. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSurface and Thin Film Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAdsorptionDipoleChemical physicsChemistrySurface (topology)Gibbs isothermPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adsorption at surfaces has been a topic of considerable interest since Gibbs introduced his famous adsorption equation in 1875. However, only in the past few years, has adsorption become quantitatively understood (at least in the vicinity of a critical point). Adsorption is far more complex than perhaps one might envision. At the liquid–vapour interface of a binary liquid mixture one can find: (i) strong adsorption (where one component completely saturates the surface); (ii) competitive adsorption (where the two species compete for surface sites); and (iii) dipole surface orientational order (due to dipole-image dipole interactions). In this paper we discuss these various modes of adsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSurface and Thin Film PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207