Nickel(ii) complexes of heterodichalcogenido and monochalcogenido imidodiphosphinate ligands: AACVD synthesis of nickel ditelluride
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of two equivalents of (TMEDA)Li[(EP(i)Pr(2))(TeP(i)Pr(2))N] (E = S, Se) with NiBr(2)(DME) in THF at 23 degrees C yields homoleptic complexes of heterodichalcogenido PNP ligands Ni[(EP(i)Pr(2))(TeP(i)Pr(2))N](2) (2, E = S; 3, E = Se). Similarly, the complexes Ni[(P(i)Pr(2))(EP(i)Pr(2))N](2) (4, E = Se; 5, E = Te) are obtained by in situ deprotonation of the neutral monochalcogenides E=P(i)Pr(2)NP(H)(i)Pr(2) (E = Se, Te) with (n)BuLi in THF at -78 degrees C followed by addition of NiBr(2)(DME). The complexes 2-5 have been characterised by multinuclear ((1)H, (31)P, (77)Se and (125)Te) NMR spectroscopy in solution and by X-ray crystallography in the solid state, the results of which show that they all exist as the square planar, trans isomers. Aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition (AACVD) of Ni[(SeP(i)Pr(2))(TeP(i)Pr(2))N](2) yields crystalline Ni(0.51)Te films at 450-500 degrees C, which were analysed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".