Effect of substrate surface on the structure and electronic properties of cubic boron nitride films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cubic boron nitride (c-BN) films were prepared by mass-selected ion beam deposition (MSIBD) technique. The effects of substrate surface roughness were investigated by boron and nitrogen k-edge x-ray absorption near-edge structure, x-ray diffraction, and atomic force microscopy. All the films are a mixture of nanocrystalline sp3-bonded c-BN and sp2-bonded BN phases. The substrate with a rough surface causes a decrease of the c-BN phase content of the film on it. A significant large lattice contraction of the c-BN crystallites in the films, relative to the bulk, is observed. It is also found that the electronic structure of the nanocrystalline c-BN films by MSIBD technique is somewhat different from that of microcrystalline c-BN∕h-BN references. We attribute the effect of the nature of the substrate on the morphology and structure of the c-BN films to the orientation of sp2-bonded graphitic BN basal plane on the top surface of the films during their growth, and the lattice contraction and energy band structure modification of c-BN films to the large compressive stress, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".