MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043620422 · doi:10.1080/02688690500145597

Early myocardial dysfunction following subarachnoid haemorrhage

2005· article· en· W2043620422 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Neurosurgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodynamicsCardiologyInternal medicineDiastoleAneurysmSubarachnoid hemorrhageSubarachnoid haemorrhageBlood pressureSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Like systolic dysfunction (SD), diastolic dysfunction (DD) has recently been proposed as a contributing factor in haemodynamic instability and in the genesis of pulmonary oedema, but its occurrence in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) patients has not been described. Following aneurysmal SAH, three patients arrived at our institution with haemodynamic instability requiring vasoactive drugs and with pulmonary oedema. Transoesophageal echocardiographic study during aneurysm surgery documented mild to severe left ventricular SD and DD. Right ventricular SD and DD were also present. Documented biventricular systolic and diastolic myocardial dysfunctions may contribute to haemodynamic instability and pulmonary oedema following SAH due to intracranial aneurysmal rupture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it