MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043638543 · doi:10.1353/chq.2007.0027

E. Nesbit's Psammead Trilogy: A Children's Classic at 100 (review)

2007· article· en· W2043638543 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth Gargano

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren's Literature Association quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilogyArtAdventurePerformance artArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: E. Nesbit’s Psammead Trilogy: A Children’s Classic at 100 Elizabeth Gargano (bio) E. Nesbit’s Psammead Trilogy: A Children’s Classic at 100. Edited by Raymond E. Jones. Lanham, MD, Toronto, and Oxford: Children’s Literature Association and Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2006. In E. Nesbit's The Story of the Amulet, the child-protagonists travel into the future and are horrified to learn that they have grown up. Gazing at a photograph of their adult selves with "loathing," they resist the "horrid" idea of "changing" into adults (Amulet 243). One hundred years after the publication of Amulet, Cyril, Anthea, Robert, and Jane might be pleased to learn that their childhood adventures continue to haunt, enchant, and disturb readers, sparking critical debates and controversies. The third entry in the Children's Literature Association's Centennial Series, published in conjunction with Scarecrow Press, is E. Nesbit's Psammead Trilogy: A Children's Classic at 100, edited by Raymond E. Jones. The volume takes its place beside previous anthologies exploring such classics as Beatrix Potter's Tale of Peter Rabbit and L. Frank Baum's Wizard of Oz series. The anthology's thirteen essays explore a range of seminal issues in the critical literature on Nesbit's work: her often conflicted portrayals of gender, class, and the imperial enterprise; her Fabianism and its influence on her work; and her generic and stylistic innovations. In addition, a number of provocative essays examine Nesbit's habit of borrowing liberally from previous texts and her wide-ranging and enduring literary influence on later writers. [End Page 183] Emphasizing the Psammead trilogy's creative engagement with contemporary assumptions about gender, Claudia Nelson's strong lead essay argues that Nesbit's "narratives first embrace contemporaneous understandings of manliness and then back away from them" (2). Thus, in Five Children and It, Cyril's plucky individualism at first seems to offer the best chance for controlling the disruptive magical interludes that result from the children's irresponsible wishes. Ultimately, however, Cyril's initial "authority. . . yields to that of" the more maternal "Anthea" (9), who deftly resolves dangerous situations involving Indian attacks as well as stolen jewels found in her mother's bedroom. Yet Nelson sees more than a simple shift from male to female authority at work in Nesbit's trilogy. As Cyril recognizes in Anthea the qualities of a "'born general'" (10), and as the aggressive, individualistic boys learn to become "loving and patient baby-minders," gender distinctions blur, and the novels increasingly valorize a flexible and shifting "androgyny" (12). Like Nelson's subtle and layered analysis of gender, Suzanne Rahn's "News from E. Nesbit: The Story of the Amulet and the Socialist Utopia" suggests that Nesbit's work was more subversive of late Victorian norms than many critics have acknowledged. Already widely influential, Rahn's previously published essay argues that the last novel in Nesbit's trilogy is "unified by a visionary theme—the quest for a socialist utopia" (187). While numerous critics emphasize the dichotomy between Nesbit's Fabianism and the middle-class ethos of her children's fiction, Rahn traces a series of narrative contrasts between the ugliness and sadness of modern-day London and more beautiful cities from other times and places, including the "arcadian" and "tribal society" of the ancient Britons, a pre-capitalist green world (196), and the future incarnation of socialist London, where the Thames runs "clear and crystal" and school is "the loveliest place there is" (199). Along with Rahn's seminal article, two other essays provocatively examine issues of class, Fabianism, and empire. Monica Flegel's "Fabianism and Didacticism in E. Nesbit's Writing for Children" contends that Nesbit's fiction did indeed embody the teachings of Fabianism. Yet Flegel finds important limitations in both Nesbit's fiction and political philosophy, since both aim to erase class differences not by embracing diverse perspectives but instead by establishing a hegemony of middle-class values, centering on the "comforts and security of the middle-class home" (35). Like Flegel, Mavis Rheimer locates political content in the often episodic narrative structures of Nesbit's tales; her essay, "Writing Empire in E. Nesbit's Psammead Books," documents Nesbit...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren's Literature Association quarterlySame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207