MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043656141 · doi:10.1029/2003jb002498

Temporal changes in <i>P</i> wave attenuation in the Loma Prieta rupture zone

2004· article· en· W2043656141 on OpenAlexaff
Kin‐Yip Chun, Gary Henderson, Jingsong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAttenuationSeismologyCompactionAmplitudeShock wavePorositySaturation (graph theory)MineralogyGeotechnical engineeringMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clusters of recurring, nearly identical microearthquakes have been recorded near Loma Prieta, California. Such events make possible direct measurement of temporal changes in the attenuation operator t* along fixed paths under what are tantamount to laboratory conditions. Analysis of almost 10 years of P wave data following the 18 October 1989 Loma Prieta, California, main shock (M = 7.0) reveals a large‐amplitude t* increase within the first 3 weeks of the main shock. A gradual t* recovery toward its level prior to the main shock is seen in the years ensuing. The results point to changes in porosity and fluid saturation taking place in parts of the main shock source volume, stemming from coseismic crack opening and postseismic relaxation processes such as postseismic fluid flow into the cracks, crack healing, and rock compaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207