MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043656798 · doi:10.1145/2460625.2460679

Wo.Defy

2013· article· en· W2043656798 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombingWearable computerEmbodied cognitionFashion designProcess (computing)Human–computer interactionComputer scienceAestheticsVisual artsArchitectural engineeringMultimediaEngineeringArtClothingHistoryMaterials scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the design process of Wo.Defy, an interactive wearable kinetic garment inspired by the Self-Combing Sisters, a group of suffragette North Cantonese Chinese women of the late 19th and early 20th century, who challenged the traditional marital status of women through their choice of hair-styling and dress. The design and construction of the Wo.Defy interactive garment incorporates cultural and material references used by the Self-Combing Sisters. The garment responds to the wearer's physiological breathing patterns through physical kinetic movements in the form of motorized contracting floral doilies. Silk fibers and human hair are integrated into the garment as organic materials referencing personal and social memory. Wo.Defy contributes to the design discourse of Tangible Embodied Interaction by integrating cultural historical research into contemporary wearable design practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2600.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207