MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043703055 · doi:10.2118/2004-300

Nexen / OPTI Long Lake Pilot Project-SAGD Drilling Experience

2004· article· en· W2043703055 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dustin Becker, C. Hamilton, F. Villegas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsDrillingPetroleum engineeringGeologyComputer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Major operators are beginning to realize the vast potential of the non-mineable Athabasca Oil Sands using the SAGD (Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage) Process. Nexen Canada Ltd. and OPTI Canada Inc. together in a 50/50 joint venture, initiated a three-pair slant hole SAGD horizontal pilot project at Long Lake, located approximately 40km. southeast of Fort McMurray, in preparation for a 130-well commercial project to commence in the fall of 2004. SAGD drilling technology has been developed in Canada over the last 12 years; however, this pilot presented several unique drilling challenges associated with larger hole sizes coupled with spudding at an angle. This paper describes these, as well as others including community relations, weather, reservoir geology, pre-planning, well design, execution, optimization and unexpected problems. Lessons learned and recommendations for future operations will be reviewed. Introduction The Long Lake SAGD Pilot Drilling Project was the first project for Nexen/OPTI. The objectives of the project were as follows:Demonstrate the ability to safely and successfully drill, complete and start up SAGD wells;Gain and build inhouse experience;Demonstrate commercially viable well performance;Understand the impact of Long Lake Geology on SAGD performance and evaluate the use of 3D seismic in well placement;Drill and case three well pairs (2 large diameter; 1 slim diameter) that achieve the desired trajectories in the minimum amount of time and within the approved budget;Identify areas for improvement and capture lessons learned for possible application to the SAGD commercial phase of the project. Resource And Geology Nexen and OPTI are equal partners in the Long Lake property, located 40km. southeast of Fort McMurray (Figure #1). The lease covers about 52,000 acres (81 sections). The Long Lake Commercial Project will be developed in several phases. The first will encompass 65 well pairs intersecting approximately 20 sections; and its pilot project located almost at the center of the Project Area (Figure #2). The oil sands in this Long Lake property are contained within the McMurray Formation, the basal unit of the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group. The McMurray Formation directly overlies the sub-Cretaceous unconformity that is developed on the Paleozoic carbonates of the Beaverhill Lake Group (Figure #3). Directly overlying the McMurray Formation are the Wabiskaw, Clearwater and Grand Rapids formations of the Mannville Group. The Quaternary zone which overlies the Grand Rapids also exists as a deep incising channel which cuts through the McMurray on the eastern side of the lease. A buffer of 150m is to be established between the ends of the horizontal well and the point where the Quaternary Channel intersects the McMurray Formation seismic marker, to minimize the potential for communication between any steam chambers and the Channel. Over the project area, gross sand in the McMurray Formation ranges from 46m in areas of abandoned channel sequences, to over 120m in areas of channeled sand sequences. Within this thickness, the McMurray net pay can range from several meters to more than 60m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207