Inorganic Polyphosphate Stimulates Cartilage Tissue Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical utilization of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs has been limited by their inferior mechanical properties compared to native articular cartilage. A number of strategies have been investigated to increase the accumulation of major extracellular matrix components within in vitro-formed cartilage, including the administration of growth factors and mechanical stimulation. In this study, the anabolic effect of inorganic polyphosphates, a linear polymer of orthophosphate residues linked by phosphoanhydride bonds, was demonstrated in both chondrocyte cultures and native articular cartilage cultured ex vivo. Compared to untreated controls, polyphosphate treatment of three-dimensional primary chondrocyte cultures induced increased glycosaminoglycan and collagen accumulation in a concentration- and chain length-dependent manner. This effect was transient, because chondrocytes express exopolyphosphatases that hydrolyze polyphosphate. The anabolic effect of polyphosphates was accompanied by a lower rate of DNA increase within the chondrocyte cultures treated with inorganic polyphosphate. Inorganic polyphosphate enhances cartilage matrix accumulation and is a promising approach to improve the quality of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".