Le prêtre, le ministre et l’apostat. Les stratégies pastorales face au protestantisme canadien-français au XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En prenant pour cadre d’étude le diocèse de Saint-Hyacinthe, cet article vise à présenter les différentes composantes de la stratégie catholique à l’égard du protestantisme canadien-français au XIXe siècle. Il expose les principaux arguments utilisés pour défendre le catholicisme et s’intéresse aux efforts déployés par le clergé pour réintégrer les apostats au sein de l’Église. Les propos des prêtres et leur perception du protestantisme se révèlent être en filiation directe avec l’apologétique post-tridentine condamnant vigoureusement la Réforme et les Réformés. Au total, l’activité pastorale a contribué à forger l’image que les fidèles avaient d’eux-mêmes, de leur Église et de leur foi. Elle exaltait l’institution catholique, sa hiérarchie et ses rites et tenait, en parallèle, un discours intransigeant, et même intolérant, envers les protestants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".