MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043788667 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6090745

Interpretation of coarse-graining of Lempel-Ziv complexity measure in ECG signal analysis

2011· article· en· W2043788667 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityGranularityMeasure (data warehouse)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceData miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lempel-Ziv (LZ) complexity measure has been applied to classify ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). The coarse-graining process plays a crucial role in the LZ complexity measure analysis, which directly affects the separating performance of VT and VF in ECG signal analysis. The question of different coarse-graining approaches interpretability in ECG signal analysis and their influence on the performance of ECG classification have not yet been previously addressed in the literature. In this paper, we present four coarse-graining process approaches, K-Means, Mean, Median and Mid-point. Our test shows that K-Means algorithm is superior to the other three approaches in VT and VF separation rate, Particularly, optimum performance is achieved at a 8-second window length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207