A PCR-RFLP method to detect hybridization between the invasive Eurasian watermilfoil (<i>Myriophyllum spicatum</i>) and the native northern watermilfoil (<i>Myriophyllum sibiricum</i>), and its application in Ontario lakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of hybridization between the invasive Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) and native northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum Kom.) has generated interest in establishing the hybrid’s distribution and invasiveness. Identification of hybrid M. spicatum × M. sibiricum requires molecular genetic analysis, however, as the hybrid’s morphology overlaps with both parent species. Using plants collected from 10 lakes in Ontario, Canada, we compared a previous method of identification (sequencing the nuclear ITS region) with a simpler screening method (PCR-RFLP of the ITS region). Both methods agreed on the identification of hybrid M. spicatum × M. sibiricum and both parent species, supporting the suitability of PCR-RFLP to screen for the hybrid. Four of 29 samples were identified as hybrid M. spicatum × M. sibiricum, which were all found in three adjacent lakes associated with the Rideau Canal Waterway. The PCR-RFLP method should enable greater sampling effort to screen for hybrid M. spicatum × M. sibiricum and establish its geographic distribution across connected waterways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".