MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043829071 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450850409

Using Dynamic Optimization Technique to Study the Operation of Batch Reactors

2007· article· en· W2043829071 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daim‐Yuang Sun, Pi‐Min Lin, Shu‐Ping Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimulated annealingRobustness (evolution)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceContinuous stirred-tank reactorBatch reactorOptimal controlDynamic programmingBatch processingControl theory (sociology)Control (management)MathematicsEngineeringChemical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract How to apply the global optimization technique, simulated annealing, and to explore the operation of batch reactors is addressed in this study. Based on the operating purposes and the imposed constraints, the batch reactor operations are first formulated as two optimal control problems: the maximal yield (or conversion) problem and the minimal operating time problem. The problems are then converted into non‐linear programming problems by the concept of control vector parameterization. The converted problems are solved by the algorithm derived from simulated annealing to determine the optimal operating policy and the performance index. These results are useful in assessing design and operation of batch reactors. In this article, the CSTR model is used to demonstrate the convenience and robustness of the proposed algorithm. Two typical reaction models are used to discuss the operations based on the optimal solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207