Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’histoire et l’analyse théorique constituent deux champs cognitifs distincts dans les études théâtrales, lesquels néanmoins sont sectionnés dans de nombreux cas. En rapport avec l’histoire du théâtre, nous pouvons distinguer deux positions logiques. Conformément à la première, l’histoire enregistre et offre la matière première de chaque pensée secondaire sur les événements théâtraux. Ce qui est contesté souvent est le caractère « objectif » de la matière historique. Conformément à la deuxième position, l’histoire du théâtre n’est pas un ensemble évident d’événements, puisqu’elle ne peut pas reproduire le passé, mais elle offre un texte infini qui interprète le passé. Chaque discours historique contient une philosophie de l’histoire partiellement développée et souvent sous-entendue. La combinaison de ces positions nous offre toute la dynamique du discours historique et ouvre le dialogue avec les théories du théâtre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".