MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043866824 · doi:10.1300/j134v08n04_02

Constructing the Threat of Insurgency: Inherent Inequalities in the Development of the Guatemalan Counterinsurgent State

2004· article· en· W2043866824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Poverty · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsurgencyState (computer science)InequalityDevelopment economicsPolitical sciencePoliticsSocial inequalityEthnic groupPolitical economyEconomic growthSociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The counterinsurgent state is the continuing legacy of political violence that afflicted Guatemala for the last thirty years of the 20th century. As the Guatemalan counterinsurgent state entrenched itself into the country's social fabric, it promoted a highly unequal social, cultural, and economic development that still plagues the country today. The paper explores how economic, gender and ethnic inequalities were heightened by the integration of counterinsurgency violence into the everyday functioning of the Guatemalan state. Focusing on the processes through which the insurgent threat was promoted, the paper analyses the lasting effects of counterinsurgency-fuelled social change in Guatemala. KEYWORDS: ViolenceGuatemalainequalitycounterinsurgencystate formationgenderethnicity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it