MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043870528 · doi:10.1159/000185814

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease and Nephropathy in a Mother and Daughter with a Review of the Literature

2008· review· en· W2043870528 on OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Paul, Daniel Fernández, William Pryse‐Phillips, M.H. Gault

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDaughterNephropathyProteinuriaDiseaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyKidneyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a mother-and-child combination of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and nephropathy. The mother received a cadaveric renal transplant, and the daughter has heavy proteinuria with normal glomerular filtration rate. There have been 7 single case reports of both disease entities and 1 report of 3 patients which includes the only sib pair. The related literature is reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207