Moderating Effect of Gender and Age on the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence with Social and Academic Adjustment among First Year University Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined whether emotional intelligence is significantly correlated with social adjustment andacademic adjustment. It also explored the moderating effects of gender and age factors and their linked betweenemotional intelligence and social adjustment as well as academic adjustment among first year university students.289 first year university students (148 males and 141 females) at the Irbid Govern Orate, North of Jordan,participate in the study and were categorized based on two age groups, younger students between the age of 18 –25 and older students between the range of 26 and above. Two valid and reliable instruments were used to assessstudent’s emotional intelligence, social adjustment and academic adjustment. Correlation and multi-groupanalysis using structural equation model were used to analyse these data. The result shows no significantrelationship between emotional intelligence and of both social adjustment and academic adjustment. In addition,the moderating effect of gender was not found. However, the moderating effect of age on the relationshipbetween emotional intelligence with social adjustment and academic adjustment were established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".