402 SUPEROVULATION OF TROPICAL-ADAPTED BOS TAURUS AND BOS INDICUS COWS IN A TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breed differences in ovarian function were found among beef Bos indicus and Bos taurus cows maintained in a subtropical environment (Alvarez P et al. 2000 J. Anim. Sci. 78, 1291-1302). The aim of this study was to compare ovarian response to superovulation and embryo production of tropical-adapted Bos taurus and Bos indicus cows. The experiment was carried out in a tropical wet climate at the experimental station of Instituto de Zootecnia (latitude 22°46'S, longitude 47°17'W) from November to February (average maximum temperature = 30.0 ± 0.8°C and average absolute precipitation = 153.1 ± 78.8 mm3). Forty Caracu (a local Bos taurus breed) and 50 Nelore (Bos indicus breed) lactating cows were treated with an intravaginal device containing progesterone (1.38 mg; CIDR-B®, Pfizer Animal Health, Montreal, Québec, Canada) and 2.5 mg i.m. of estradiol benzoate (Estrogin®, Farmavet, São Paulo, Brazil). Four days later, the animals were superovulated with multiple i.m. injections of 400 IU of FSH (Pluset®, Calier, Spain) in decreasing doses (75-75, 75-50, 50-25, and 25-25 IU) at 12-h intervals over 4 days. The CIDR-B® device was removed 3 days after the first superovulatory injection and cows received i.m. 150 µg of cloprostenol (Veteglan®, Calier, Spain). Cows were inseminated 48 and 62 h after the cloprostenol injection and embryos were recovered nonsurgically 7 days after insemination. Differences in the number of CL (assessed by ultrasound scanning), total number of ova/embryos, and number of transferable embryos were analyzed by ANOVA. Differences in the number of animals with low response (<3 CL) to superovulation were analyzed by chi-square test. All donors (with the exception of 1 Caracu and 2 Nelore) with ovarian response >3 CL showed estrus at insemination. Three (8.9%) Caracu and 5 (10.0%) Nelore cows had <3 CL following the superovulation treatment (P = 0.68). There was no difference (P > 0.05) in the mean (± SEM) CL counts of Caracu (11.4 ± 3.3) and Nelore (12.0 ± 4.1) cows. Similarly, there were no differences (P > 0.05) between Caracu and Nelore cows for total number of ova/embryos collected (8.6 ± 2.6 v. 9.0 ± 4.3) or transferable embryos (6.0 ± 2.4 v. 5.1 ± 2.9). In conclusion, the superovulation of Caracu and Nelore cows carried out in a tropical climate resulted in similar ovarian responses and embryo production. Supported by FAPESP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".