Mutagenesis of Folylpolyglutamate Synthetase Indicates That Dihydropteroate and Tetrahydrofolate Bind to the Same Site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) enzyme of Escherichia coli differs from that of Lactobacillus casei in having dihydrofolate synthetase activity, which catalyzes the production of dihydrofolate from dihydropteroate. The present study undertook mutagenesis to identify structural elements that are directly responsible for the functional differences between the two enzymes. The amino terminal domain (residues 1-287) of the E. coli FPGS was found to bind tetrahydrofolate and dihydropteroate with the same affinity as the intact enzyme. The domain-swap chimera proteins between the E. coli and the L. casei enzymes possess both folate or pteroate binding properties and enzymatic activities of their amino terminal portion, suggesting that the N-terminal domain determines the folate substrate specificity. Recent structural studies have identified two unique folate binding sites, the omega loop in L. casei FPGS and the dihydropteroate binding loop in the E. coli enzyme. Mutants with swapped omega loops retained the activities and folate or pteroate binding properties of the rest of the enzyme. Mutating L. casei FPGS to contain an E. coli FPGS dihydropteroate binding loop did not alter its substrate specificity to using dihydropteroate as a substrate. The mutant D154A, a residue specific for the dihydropteroate binding site in E. coli FPGS, and D151A, the corresponding mutant in the L. casei enzyme, were both defective in using tetrahydrofolate as their substrate, suggesting that the binding site corresponding to the E. coli pteroate binding site is also the tetrahydrofolate binding site for both enzymes. Tetrahydrofolate diglutamate was a slightly less effective substrate than the monoglutamate with the wild-type enzyme but was a 40-fold more effective substrate with the D151A mutant. This suggests that the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate binding site identified in the L. casei ternary structure may bind diglutamate and polyglutamate folate derivatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".