MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043998138 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.002

Co-localization between the BOLD response and epileptiform discharges recorded by simultaneous intracranial EEG-fMRI at 3 T

2015· article· en· W2043998138 on OpenAlexafffund
Yahya Aghakhani, Craig A. Beers, Daniel J. Pittman, Ismael Gaxiola‐Valdez, Bradley G. Goodyear, Paolo Federico

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEEG-fMRINeurosciencePsychologyAudiologyBrain mappingCognitive psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Simultaneous scalp EEG-fMRI can identify hemodynamic changes associated with the generation of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), and it has the potential of becoming a standard, non-invasive technique for pre-surgical assessment of patients with medically intractable epilepsy. This study was designed to assess the BOLD response to focal IEDs recorded via simultaneous intracranial EEG-functional MRI (iEEG-fMRI). METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients undergoing intracranial video EEG monitoring were recruited for iEEG-fMRI studies at 3 T. Depth, subdural strip, or grid electrodes were implanted according to our standard clinical protocol. Subjects underwent 10-60 min of continuous iEEG-fMRI scanning. IEDs were marked, and the most statistically significant clusters of BOLD signal were identified (Z-score 2.3, p value < 0.05). We assessed the concordance between the locations of the BOLD response and the IED. Concordance was defined as a distance <1.0 cm between the IED and BOLD response location. Negative BOLD responses were not studied in this project. RESULTS: Nine patients (7 females) with a mean age of 31 years (range 22-56) had 11 different types of IEDs during fMR scanning. The IEDs were divided based on the location of the active electrode contact into mesial temporal, lateral temporal, and extra-temporal. Seven (5 left) mesial temporal IED types were recorded in 5 patients (110-2092 IEDs per spike location). Six of these IEDs had concordant BOLD response in the ipsilateral mesial temporal structures, <1 cm from the most active contact. One of the two subjects with left lateral temporal IEDs had BOLD responses concordant with the location of the most active contact, as well other ipsilateral and contralateral sites. Notably, the remaining two subjects with extratemporal discharges showed no BOLD signal near the active electrode contact. CONCLUSIONS: iEEG-fMRI is a feasible and low-risk method for assessment of hemodynamic changes of very focal IEDs that may not be recorded by scalp EEG. A high concordance rate between the location of the BOLD response and IEDs was seen for mesial temporal (6/7) IEDs. Significant BOLD activation was also seen in areas distant from the active electrode and these sites exhibited maximal BOLD activation in the majority of cases. This implies that iEEG-fMRI may further describe the areas involved in the generation of IEDs beyond the vicinity of the electrode(s).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207