MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044021473 · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.054

ApoE secretion modulating bromotyrosine derivative from the Australian marine sponge Callyspongia sp.

2014· article· en· W2044021473 on OpenAlexaff
Liwen Tian, Yunjiang Feng, Yoko Shimizu, Tom Pfeifer, Cheryl L. Wellington, John N. A. Hooper, Ronald J. Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenueBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMarine Sponges and Natural Products
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre for Drug Research and Development
FundersQueensland GovernmentAustralian Research CouncilGriffith UniversityAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
KeywordsSpongeChemistryStereochemistryNatural productSecretionDerivative (finance)FractionationBiochemistryOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High throughput screening of a pre-fractionated natural product library identified 11 active fractions showing ApoE modulation activity. Mass-directed fractionation of one active crude extract from the Australian marine sponge Callyspongia sp. resulted in the isolation of 13 metabolites, including three new bromotyrosine derivatives, callyspongic acid (1), 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxyphenylpyruvic acid (2), N-acetyl-3-bromo-4-hydroxylphenylethamine (3), and ten known compounds (4-13). The structure elucidation of compounds 1-3 was based on their 1D and 2D NMR and MS spectroscopic data. 3,5-Dibromo-4-methoxyphenylpyruvic acid (2) showed weak activity in increasing the apolipoprotein E secretion from human CCF-STTG1 cells at the concentration of 40 μM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry LettersSame topicMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsFrench-language works237,207