MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044035285 · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-11-3622

A novel missense mutation in the γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase catalytic subunit gene causes both decreased enzymatic activity and glutathione production

2003· article· en· W2044035285 on OpenAlexaff
David P. Hamilton, Jian Wu, Moulay A. Alaoui‐Jamali, Gerald Batist

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBiochemistryMissense mutationGlutathioneCysteineMolecular biologyMutationProtein subunitAmino acidEnzymeMutantGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (gamma-GCS) catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step in glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis: the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent ligation of glutamate and cysteine. gamma-GCS consists of a catalytic (gamma-GCSH) and modifier (gamma-GCSL) subunit. Hereditary deficiency of gamma-GCS has been reported in a small number of patients and is associated with low erythrocyte levels of gamma-GCS and GSH leading to hemolytic anemia. Here we report a novel gamma-GCSH mutation, isolated from the cDNA of 2 related patients diagnosed with gamma-GCS deficiency. Each was found to be homozygous for a C>T missense mutation at nucleotide 379, encoding for a predicted Arg127Cys amino acid change. Computerized structure modeling identified that the mutated amino acid lies within a cleft on the protein surface of gamma-GCSH, and the border of this cleft was shown to contain Cys249, an evolutionarily conserved residue that has been proven to lie near the binding site of gamma-GCSH. Transfection studies showed that the mutation is associated with decreased GSH production, and binding studies using purified recombinant protein showed that the mutant protein has markedly decreased enzymatic activity compared to wild type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207