MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044036905 · doi:10.1021/bi000224u

Oblique Membrane Insertion of Viral Fusion Peptide Probed by Neutron Diffraction

2000· article· en· W2044036905 on OpenAlex
Jeremy P. Bradshaw, Malcolm J.M. Darkes, Thad A. Harroun, John Katsaras, Richard M. Epand

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipid bilayer fusionLipid bilayerFusionBilayerPeptideLamellar structureBiophysicsCrystallographyNeutron diffractionMembraneChemistryPhospholipidViral membraneViral envelopeBiochemistryBiologyCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fusion peptides mimic the membrane fusion activities of the larger viral proteins from which they derive their sequences. A possible mode of activity involves their oblique insertion into lipid bilayers, causing membrane disruption by promoting highly curved hemifusion intermediates, leading to fusion. We have determined the location and orientation of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) fusion peptide in planar lipid bilayers using neutron lamellar diffraction. The helical axis of the peptide adopts an angle of 55 degrees relative to the membrane normal, while it positions itself nearest the lipid bilayer surface. This is the first direct observation of the structural interaction between a fusion peptide and a phospholipid bilayer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it