Identification of PEX5p-related novel peroxisome-targeting signal 1 (PTS1)-binding proteins in mammals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on peroxin protein 5 (Pex5p) homology searches in the expressed sequence tag database and sequencing of large full-length cDNA inserts, three novel and related human cDNAs were identified. The brain-derived cDNAs coded for two related proteins that differ only slightly at their N-terminus, and exhibit 39.8% identity to human PEX5p. The shorter liver-derived cDNA coded for the C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat-containing domain of the brain cDNA-encoded proteins. Since these three proteins specifically bind to various C-terminal peroxisome-targeting signals in a manner indistinguishable from Pex5p and effectively compete with Pex5p in an in vitro peroxisome-targeting signal 1 (PTS1)-binding assay, we refer to them as 'Pex5p-related proteins' (Pex5Rp). In contrast to Pex5p, however, human PEX5Rp did not bind to Pex14p or to the RING finger motif of Pex12p, and could not restore PTS1 protein import in Pex5(-/-) mouse fibroblasts. Immunofluorescence analysis of epitope-tagged PEX5Rp in Chinese hamster ovary cells suggested an exclusively cytosolic localization. Northern-blot analysis showed that the PEX5R gene, which is localized to chromosome 3q26.2--3q27, is expressed preferentially in brain. Mouse PEX5Rp was also delineated. In addition, experimental evidence established that the closest-related yeast homologue, YMR018wp, did not bind PTS1. Based on its subcellular localization and binding properties, Pex5Rp may function as a regulator in an early step of the PTS1 protein import process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".