MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044064795 · doi:10.1080/00218460210382

Temperature dependence of polymer interaction: Relevance to adhesion

2002· article· en· W2044064795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Adhesion · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolymerLondon dispersion forceDiscontinuity (linguistics)Base (topology)Bond strengthAdhesionDispersion (optics)Lower critical solution temperatureThermodynamicsComposite materialMoleculeAdhesiveOrganic chemistryChemistryLayer (electronics)Copolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acid-base interaction parameters, obtained from inverse gas chromatographic data, have been studied as function of temperature for a series of homopolymers. Acid-base functionality varies inversely with temperature, permitting the identification of a critical temperature where acid-base interaction abates, leaving dispersion forces to act at the surface. Polymer assemblies, prepared at temperatures encompassing the critical values, display a discontinuity in lap-shear bond strength. In inherently incompatible pairs, the abatement of unfavorable acid-base forces enhanced bond strength. An adverse effect was noted in assemblies containing polymers with favorable acid-base interaction. Bond strengths of assemblies joined above critical temperatures display a time-dependent reversion to equilibrium values when exposed to lower temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it