MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hemodialysis Catheter Tip Embolization in the Right Pulmonary Vasculature: Report of a Cardiac Arrest

2003· article· en· W2044065285 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphanie Raymond-Carrier, Michel Dubé, Linda Nolin, Denis Ouimet, Martine Leblanc

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCatheterDialysis catheterEmbolizationSurgeryHemodialysisGunshot woundRight pulmonary arteryIntensive care unitAngiographyPulmonary arteryAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 44 year old woman on hemodialysis presented a sudden cardiorespiratory arrest at the end of an otherwise uneventful dialysis session. It occurred while disconnecting the circuit from her tunneled catheter. She was reanimated and then transferred to the intensive care unit; the endotracheal intubation had been difficult, and she had been severely hypoxic. It was noted that the external venous clamp of the tunneled catheter was broken and the hypothesis of a break during the reanimation process was entertained. The routine chest x-ray postintubation showed that the tip of the catheter was ruptured and visible in one branch of the right pulmonary artery. The catheter was changed over a guide wire, and the broken catheter was sent for analysis to the manufacturer. A selective angiography of the right pulmonary artery was performed with the purpose of removing the fractured catheter tip but was unsuccessful. The patient recovered neurologic function slowly over the next 4 months. The exact etiology of the arrest remains incompletely understood; it is unknown whether it was caused by the catheter tip embolization or if an air embolism occurred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASAIO JournalSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207