MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044068054 · doi:10.3139/217.1575

An Investigation of Venturi and Coanda Effects in Blown Film Cooling

2000· article· en· W2044068054 on OpenAlexafffund
V. Sidiropoulos, J. Vlachopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsVenturi effectMechanicsBody orificeBubbleMaterials scienceSuctionJet (fluid)AirflowTurbulenceHeat fluxVolume (thermodynamics)Orifice plateVolume of fluid methodFlow (mathematics)Heat transferMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Numerical simulation of turbulent air flow tangentially impinging on a blown film bubble has been carried out. The cooling air is assumed to originate from a dual orifice adjustable air-ring. The stream line pattern and heat flux are determined through a finite volume numerical technique using a version of the so called k-∊ modeling. It is shown that as the air flows through the air ring passage relatively large under-pressure is created (Venturi effect), which applies a suction to the bubble. Depending on the flow rates and geometrical configurations the air jet may attach itself (Coanda effect) to either the air ring surface and/or to the bubble. The Coanda effect has a significant influence on local heat flux. The numerical results suggest that the Venturi and Coanda effects influence significantly process stability, production rate and final film properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Polymer ProcessingSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207