MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044092247 · doi:10.1139/p09-114

Dispersive shock waves propagating in the cubic-quintic derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation

2010· article· en· W2044092247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDissipative systemQuintic functionShock waveNonlinear systemShock (circulatory)Nonlinear Schrödinger equationClassical mechanicsRogue waveSIGNAL (programming language)Mathematical analysisMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The propagation of a dispersive shock wave is studied in a quintic-derivative nonlinear Schrödinger (Q-DNLS) equation, which may describe, for example, the wave propagation on a discrete electrical transmission line. It is shown that a physical system described by a Q-DNLS equation without a dissipative term may support the propagation of shock waves. The influence of the derivative nonlinearity terms on the shock is analyzed. Using the found exact shock solutions of the Q-DNLS equation as the initial input signal, we investigate numerically the spatiotemporal stability of the shock signal in the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it